On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 06:07:27PM -0500, Clinton Sprain wrote:
> Couple things:
> 
> - Is your approach because we aren't sure if there are bcm5974 or
> appletouch devices lurking somewhere between 0x223-0x229 or 0x22c-0x22f?

nah, my quick diff was simply incomplete, sorry.

> If so, I think we should err on the side of appletouch and go with my original
> suggestion. Appletouch defaults on a bcm5974 device are much more usable
> than bcm5974 defaults on an appletouch device.

> - If you still feel your approach is better, I believe it needs to go after 
> the "{0x05ac, 0x223, PRODUCT_ANY, MODEL_UNIBODY_MACBOOK}" line instead of 
> before; the device qualifies for both lines and my testing indicates the last 
> qualifying line takes precedence. Alternatively we could nix the ambiguity 
> and just do something like:
> 
>      {0x0002, 0x0007, 0x0007, MODEL_SYNAPTICS},
>      {0x0002, 0x0008, 0x0008, MODEL_ALPS},
>      {0x05ac, PRODUCT_ANY, 0x222, MODEL_APPLETOUCH},
> +    {0x05ac, 0x223, 0x228, MODEL_UNIBODY_MACBOOK},
> +    {0x05ac, 0x229, 0x22b, MODEL_APPLETOUCH},
> +    {0x05ac, 0x22c, PRODUCT_ANY, MODEL_UNIBODY_MACBOOK},
> -    {0x05ac, 0x223, PRODUCT_ANY, MODEL_UNIBODY_MACBOOK},
>      {0x0002, 0x000e, 0x000e, MODEL_ELANTECH},
>      {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}
> 
> This also makes it easier to understand at a glance.

I think this is the best approach. Can you send me a signed-off
git-formatted patch for this change? ASAP, I'm about to release the 1.8 RC2

Cheers,
   Peter

> On 04/29/2014 12:28 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:20:19PM -0500, Clinton Sprain wrote:
> >> Macbook 3,1, Macbook 4,1 (not Air). First reported in Ubuntu 13.10 from 
> >> what I've seen. This makes sense as the problematic change appears to have 
> >> been introduced between 1.6.3 and 1.7.1, which was the version jump 
> >> between 13.04 and 13.10.
> >>
> >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-input-synaptics/commit/src/synaptics.c?id=0e222876d7da7acbaaf955c2e7b7efdf3549bde9
> >>
> >> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/145837828/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics_1.6.3-0ubuntu1.1_1.7.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
> >>
> >> See also:
> >> http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2014-February/056386.html
> >>
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-input-synaptics/+bug/1246215
> >>
> >> My Macbook 3,1 reports as 0x229. Around the web I've seen devices report
> >> as 0x22a that also use the old appletouch kernel driver. This is what I'm
> >> basing the shift on. You could potentially check the actual kernel driver
> >> being used instead (appletouch vs bcm5974) and load defaults based on that,
> >> but this would likely be a nontrivial change.
> > 
> > the kernel drivers say that 0x230 and above is bcm5974 and anything below
> > 0x223 is appletouch. In between there's 0x229, 0x22a and 0x22b for the
> > MacBook3,1, which your device falls into.
> > Based on that, this diff should work:
> > 
> > diff --git a/src/eventcomm.c b/src/eventcomm.c
> > index 0a6ea48..f97390e 100644
> > --- a/src/eventcomm.c
> > +++ b/src/eventcomm.c
> > @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ static struct model_lookup_t model_lookup_table[] = {
> >      {0x0002, 0x0007, 0x0007, MODEL_SYNAPTICS},
> >      {0x0002, 0x0008, 0x0008, MODEL_ALPS},
> >      {0x05ac, PRODUCT_ANY, 0x222, MODEL_APPLETOUCH},
> > +    {0x05ac, 0x229, 0x22b, MODEL_APPLETOUCH},
> >      {0x05ac, 0x223, PRODUCT_ANY, MODEL_UNIBODY_MACBOOK},
> >      {0x0002, 0x000e, 0x000e, MODEL_ELANTECH},
> >      {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}
> > 
> > Can you give this a try?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> >    Peter
> > 
> >>
> >> As for why it hasn't caused much of a fuss, the bug only hit the *buntus 
> >> about 6 months ago and technically-apt users will often figure out how to 
> >> work around it with synclient etc. I'd expect this to affect more people 
> >> in the near future as Apple begins to drop support for the versions of OS 
> >> X these devices are capable of running, and more users begin to migrate, 
> >> many of whom won't be as technically-apt as early adopters.
> >>
> >> - Clinton
> >>
> >> On 04/21/2014 08:30 PM, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:23:00PM -0500, Clinton Sprain wrote:
> >>>> A handful of Macbooks are being tagged as MODEL_UNIBODY_MACBOOKs when 
> >>>> they
> >>>> should not be. This causes the default sensitivity to be very low for 
> >>>> them,
> >>>> making the touchpad very difficult to use. This change moves the product 
> >>>> ID
> >>>> cutoff so those devices fall into the old bucket again.
> >>>
> >>> just to confirm: which one of those do you have or did you see the bug
> >>> reported on? Looking at the kernel's ID collection this change only 
> >>> affects
> >>> first-gen macbook airs and should've been an issue for roughly two years
> >>> already.
> >>>
> >>> Which again makes me wonder: what change exposed this bug recently? 
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>    Peter
> >>>
> >>>>  src/eventcomm.c | 4 ++--
> >>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/src/eventcomm.c b/src/eventcomm.c
> >>>> index 858efeb..405eeb9 100644
> >>>> --- a/src/eventcomm.c
> >>>> +++ b/src/eventcomm.c
> >>>> @@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ struct model_lookup_t {
> >>>>  static struct model_lookup_t model_lookup_table[] = {
> >>>>      {0x0002, 0x0007, 0x0007, MODEL_SYNAPTICS},
> >>>>      {0x0002, 0x0008, 0x0008, MODEL_ALPS},
> >>>> -    {0x05ac, PRODUCT_ANY, 0x222, MODEL_APPLETOUCH},
> >>>> -    {0x05ac, 0x223, PRODUCT_ANY, MODEL_UNIBODY_MACBOOK},
> >>>> +    {0x05ac, PRODUCT_ANY, 0x22f, MODEL_APPLETOUCH},
> >>>> +    {0x05ac, 0x230, PRODUCT_ANY, MODEL_UNIBODY_MACBOOK},
> >>>>      {0x0002, 0x000e, 0x000e, MODEL_ELANTECH},
> >>>>      {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0}
> >>>>  };
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> 1.9.1
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to