On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 10:45:04PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 02:33:21PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > On 03/20/14 05:36 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote: > > >Signed-off-by: Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> > > >--- > > > Imake.cf | 7 ++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > >diff --git a/Imake.cf b/Imake.cf > > >index 2b6c649..9e438e7 100644 > > >--- a/Imake.cf > > >+++ b/Imake.cf > > >@@ -238,8 +238,9 @@ XCOMM $XFree86: xc/config/cf/Imake.cf,v 3.88 > > >2003/12/16 21:30:21 herrb Exp $ > > > # ifdef mc68000 > > > # define Mc68020Architecture > > > # endif > > >-# ifdef __arm32__ > > >+# if defined(__arm__) || defined(__arm32__) > > > # define Arm32Architecture > > >+# undef __arm__ > > > > So __arm__ won't be set for 64-bit ARM platforms on NetBSD? > > We'll worry about that later :) 64-bit ARM is work-in-progress AFAIK. > > I don't think that __arm32__ is set for (some? many?) 32-bit ARM > platforms though.
I've asked to make sure: __arm__ is the proper test for arm32 __aarch64__ is the one for arm64 http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-arm/2014/03/23/msg002305.html Thomas _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
