Hi, On 11 March 2014 06:44, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 10:10:40PM +0100, Daniel Stone wrote: >> Ack from me - either 3 (mirror locks) or 4 (mirror all state). The >> main downside is that people listening for XKB state change events on >> slaves might see multiple events, but eh, don't do that really. I >> think there's a good argument to be made for 4 in that the master and >> slave state would then be totally coherent; it would also help the >> footpedal case. >> >> If I was doing anything at all with allowExplicit and LEDDrivesKB, >> it'd be to purge support for them entirely. The only way xkbcommon >> eventually got some form of tractability was dropping support for >> things like this, including binning mutable keymaps entirely: this >> meant abandoning the idea of ever using it in the server, but oh well. > > The second patch-set is available here: > http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2014-March/040835.html > I'd appreciate a review so I can push this. I can drop 2/4, 1/4 has a v3.
1, 3, and 4 are Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <[email protected]>; 2 is Acked-by if you want to push it, but I don't really see the value. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
