On 01/29/14 01:14 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
void
-NoticeF(const char *f, ...)
+VErrorF(const char *f, va_list args)
{
- /* XXX should Notices just be ignored if not using syslog? */
- va_list args;
- va_start(args, f);
#ifdef USE_SYSLOG
if (UseSyslog) {
vsyslog(LOG_NOTICE, f, args);
@@ -160,6 +157,15 @@ NoticeF(const char *f, ...)
fprintf(stderr, "%s notice: ", progname);
vfprintf(stderr, f, args);
#endif /* USE_SYSLOG */
+}
+
+void
+NoticeF(const char *f, ...)
+{
+ /* XXX should Notices just be ignored if not using syslog? */
+ va_list args;
+ va_start(args, f);
+ VErrorF(f, args);
va_end(args);
}
Shouldn't that have been done with ErrorF instead of NoticeF, to keep
them with the error prefix & syslog level? Seems strange to have
VErrorF come through at a different level than ErrorF.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Engineering - http://blogs.oracle.com/alanc
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
