Knut Petersen <[email protected]> writes: > Could it be that you did not test if the (rebased) const/pointer > patches break xfs again? ;-))
Did you see the three patch series for xfs that I posted yesterday? -- [email protected]
pgpDTs8GDjb0e.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
