Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> writes:

> It makes much more sense to consistently print drm_context_t as %u or
> 0x%x.  It's an unsigned int on both OpenBSD and Linux, so I suspect
> that's the case everywhere.

I'd like to keep the warning patches separate from semantic changes like
this; I think it's easier to review them when you know they're not
supposed to actually change what the code does, just inform the
compiler.

A separate patch which fixes the printf format seems like a fine plan though.

-- 
[email protected]

Attachment: pgpXq2KvlUh0H.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to