Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> writes:

>> From: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
>> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 01:50:21 -0700
>> 
>> Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>> >> From: Keith Packard <[email protected]>
>> >> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:10:24 -0700
>> >>=20
>> >> No-one uses this, so there's no reason for it to be in the library
>> >
>> > I don't really think it makes sense to remove Readv but keep Writev.
>> > It's not that you're removing a significant amount of code...
>> 
>> I removed it because I didn't want to have to add fd passing support to
>> that function. However, writev is still being used, so I did fix that
>> interface.
>
> Unfortunately your statement that Readv isn't used seems to be false.
> There is a call to _FSTransReadv in libFS/src/FSlibInt.c.

Always forgetting the horrid font server library. I guess I could just
stick the non-FD passing Readv back into xtrans, but that seems wrong
too. Or just create a fake Readv that calls the regular read.

-- 
[email protected]

Attachment: pgpwhQTLQTexL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to