On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:22:03AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> On 07/27/13 12:17 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> >No. I just took the patch as committed, but you're right, const for
> >both makes more sense -- attached.
> >
> >@@ -321,11 +321,10 @@
> >
> >WSReadInput(InputInfoPtr·pInfo)
> >}
> >static·void
> >-printWsType(char·*type,·char·*devname)
> >+printWsType(const·char·*type,·const·char·*name)
> >{
> >-····xf86Msg(X_PROBED,·"%s:·Keyboard·type:·%s\n",·devname,·type);·
> >+····xf86Msg(X_PROBED,·"%s:·Keyboard·type:·%s\n",·name,·type);
> >}
> >#endif
>
> Reviewed-by: Alan Coopersmith <[email protected]>
Thanks!
Do I add this and the other "Reviewed-by" with 'git amend' to my patch
set manually, or is there a better way?
Thomas
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
