Hi, On 9 November 2012 14:22, Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 01:44:16PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > How about enabling .xz too? > > I disabled .gz because IMO one tarball is enough, we don't need two if one > is likely never used anyway. A similar situation would apply to xz, we'd > have two tarballs but no real need. And the space savings aren't that huge > that it switching from bz2 to xz alone really makes a difference. > > 365522 xorg-gtest-0.6.0.tar.bz2 > 308152 xorg-gtest-0.6.0.tar.xz > *shrug*, I don't think a ~15% saving is really to be sneezed, plus Wayland and a lot of the GNOME projects are moving to .xz exclusively. I've just pushed a patch which moves xkbcommon to .xz only too. But, either way gzip has to go, so: Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone <[email protected]> Cheers, Daniel
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
