On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:02:56AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Thomas Klausner <[email protected]> wrote: >> > libdrm-2.4.37 added a use of ETIME (from errno(3)) in >> > intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c. >> > >> > This errno is not defined on (at least) DragonFly BSD. >> > >> > A Linux man page for errno(3) says: >> > ETIME Timer expired (POSIX.1 (XSI STREAMS option)) >> > (POSIX.1 says "STREAM ioctl(2) timeout") >> > >> > Since this errno is only defined for a POSIX extension, wouldn't it >> > make more sense to use the standard errno(3) ETIMEDOUT instead which >> > exists in more environments? >> > Thomas >> >> Does DragonFly BSD have Intel KMS? > > Not yet, but I don't see how this is relevant, because the file is > compiled on DragonFly BSD independent of that question. Can you please > explain? > Thomas
I was asking mostly out of curiosity, but at the same time I don't think compiling this (libdrm_intel) is useful without KMS. So unless I'm wrong on that point I've got to question why you're bothering to ship libdrm_intel on DragonFly BSD. Sorry for sort of off-topic. No idea about ETIME vs ETIMEDOUT. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
