On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 08:39:09AM -0700, Chase Douglas wrote: > On 05/14/2012 12:29 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > > --- > > I got sick of typing 'xinput set-prop "foo" "Device Enabled" 0' > > > > src/property.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > src/xinput.c | 10 ++++++++++ > > src/xinput.h | 2 ++ > > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/src/property.c b/src/property.c > > index 3ab2cb0..a4d07f6 100644 > > --- a/src/property.c > > +++ b/src/property.c > > @@ -824,3 +824,17 @@ int set_prop(Display *display, int argc, char *argv[], > > char *name, > > > > return do_set_prop(display, type, format, argc, argv, name, desc); > > } > > + > > +int disable(Display *display, int argc, char *argv[], char *name, char > > *desc) > > +{ > > + char *new_argv[3] = { NULL, "Device Enabled", "0" }; > > + new_argv[0] = argv[0]; > > Why can't this be: > > char *new_argv[3] = { argv[0], "Device Enabled", "0" }; > > Does it fail to compile?
it works. amended as requested. > Reviewed-by: Chase Douglas <[email protected]> thanks. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
