On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Matthieu Herrb <[email protected]> wrote: > Notwithstanding the issues with (not) using GPLv3 tools at Apple (and > probably other companies), in OpenBSD and NetBSD at least we want to > be able to build X with the tools present in the base system.
Don't you sort of think that's an untenable position? That prevents anything living under the X.Org umbrella from depending on anything that's not in the OpenBSD and NetBSD base install. Maybe we really want a minimal set of dependencies, I don't know, but bison and flex don't seem like unreasonable dependencies. I don't think you can build Mesa without flex and bison. Can you? Besides that, does anything depend on libxkbcommon except Weston? Given lack of KMS on *BSD operating systems, I don't even think you can use Weston. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
