On 10/29/11 00:16, Jeremy Huddleston wrote:
Yuck. Is there really no other way to do that? What exactly are the conflicts?
It was the best one I saw.
The Solaris definition:
struct list_node {
struct list_node *list_next;
struct list_node *list_prev;
};
struct list {
size_t list_size;
size_t list_offset;
struct list_node list_head;
};
The Xorg definition:
struct list {
struct list *next, *prev;
};
And then there's a couple overlapping function names with
conflicting argument types since the Solaris ones take list_nodes
for the individual list entries instead of struct list themselves:
Solaris:
int list_is_empty(list_t *);
Xorg:
static inline Bool list_is_empty(struct list *head);
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
