> From: Pauli <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 19:30:58 +0200 > > From: Pauli Nieminen <[email protected]> > > Here is improved version of removing random empty block and wakeup > handlers. First patch breaks the current handler code and extens > API. That patch is most likely to cause problems. Too bad > refactoring is hard to split to smaller patches.
Not sure what you mean by "most likely to cause problems"; you're keeping the old interface and don't really change how it works, so you should be fine here. And to be honest, I don't see the point of splitting up in tons of tiny micropatches. > I hope Mark likes this patch set more than previous try to eliminate extra > functions. Yes, introducing seperate functions is better than making RegisterBlockAndWakeupHandlers() accept NULL arguments, which would be an ABI break. Reviewed-by: Mark Kettenis <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
