On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 00:31 +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:

> > Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2011 18:08:11 -0500
> > 
> > For many, build.sh is the first encounter to X.Org or even UNIX
> code.
> > This comment should help them understand why certain packages cannot
> be
> > built on thier system.
> 
> Sorry, but I think this list is incomplete, and the descriptions
> inconsistent and perhaps even wrong.  I think you're better off not
> taking on the burden of maintaining it.  People who don't know what
> these terms mean and don't know how to use google don't really have a
> chance of building Xorg from source.
> 
> 

I suspected it could turn out to be the case, I am not surprised. 
I appreciate very much all the efforts put it by the reviewers which
will be put to good use in future work.

Gaetan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to