On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 09:21:40AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Mon, 3 Jan 2011 15:54:54 +0200, Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > How about this? Stills leaves the compChildrenUpdate name there > > though. > > Yeah, the structure looks good. I still don't like the names, as > compWindowUpdate paints a window into its parent (updating the parent) > and compChildrenUpdate updates the window (along with the > children). Naming is hard.
Indeed. compPaintWindowToParent + compPaintChildrenToWindow? That would still leave compWindowUpdateAutomatic somewhat misnamed. compPaintWindowToParentAutomatic would be quite a mouthful :) -- Ville Syrjälä _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
