On 01/ 2/11 06:48 AM, Mark Kettenis wrote:
>> From: Gaetan Nadon <[email protected]>
>> Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 08:58:03 -0500
>>
>> Using x86*64* rather than x86_64 is misleading to the user as it
>> implies there are a large number of possibilities.
>>
>> Use the values from config.guess which are known to be accurate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gaetan Nadon <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  build.sh |    8 ++++----
>>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> @@ -804,14 +804,14 @@ build_driver_video() {
>>  
>>      # Some drivers are only buildable on some architectures
>>      case $HOST_CPU in
>> -    *sparc*)
>> +    sparc)
>>          build driver xf86-video-suncg14
>>          build driver xf86-video-suncg3
>>          build driver xf86-video-suncg6
>>          build driver xf86-video-sunleo
>>          build driver xf86-video-suntcx
>>          ;;
> 
> This bit is almost certainly not correct.  The canonical HOST_CPU
> value for 64-bit SPARC (aka SPARC V9) is sparc64.

Though cg6 is the only one of those I've ever seen in a 64-bit SPARC.
Since cg3 & leo were Sbus cards, I think they could theoretically be put
in one, just weren't available at the same time frame - as far as I know
CG14 & TCX were only available built-in to the motherboards of 32-bit/sun4m
machines.

-- 
        -Alan Coopersmith-        [email protected]
         Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to