On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 2:18 AM, Jesse Adkins <[email protected]> wrote: > I should have been more clear. I really was wondering why there's a > vbeInit right before a vbeFree. It seems like that would end up being > a rather long no-op. > > It looks like the vbe pointer is never used by the driver, and that > this would result in everything vbe creates being freed. Assuming you > have this hardware, why not try to remove the vbe stuff entirely? If > that fails, what about substituting the vbeInit with the stuff under > int10 (the xf86InitInt10).
I don't have the hardware. Worst case, we commit the patch and don't leak a few bytes of memory. I'll let someone else actually verify the vbe stuff does something. _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
