On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:35:10AM +0200, Dirk Wallenstein wrote: > Signed-off-by: Dirk Wallenstein <[email protected]> > --- > > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:06:26AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Should this also be done for the INPUT_XKM case? > Oh, of course. Tested, too. The manual page seems to be fulfilled. > > xkbcomp.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xkbcomp.c b/xkbcomp.c > index b0df920..892062f 100644 > --- a/xkbcomp.c > +++ b/xkbcomp.c > @@ -1037,6 +1037,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) > ok = False; > break; > } > + result.xkb->device_spec = device_id; > } > else if (inputFormat == INPUT_XKM) /* parse xkm file */ > { > @@ -1053,6 +1054,7 @@ main(int argc, char *argv[]) > ERROR1("Cannot read XKM file \"%s\"\n", inputFile); > ok = False; > } > + result.xkb->device_spec = device_id; > } > else > { > -- > 1.7.1
sorry, didn't see this patch until after I wrote the other email. Pushed, thanks. Cheers, Peter _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
