On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 15:50 -0700, Jeremy Huddleston wrote: > Yes. That is what I intend to do, but I want to get in one regression > fix first which I'm asking someone to verify first.
Of course. > I intend to have out 1.9.2 with the correct util-macros tomorrow. > > > It is crucial that the > > published tarball can be reproduced by anyone from git and does not > > contain any private fix, intended or accidental. > > I agree. > > > I would like to keep the two issues separate for the sake of > clarity. I > > completely agree that this option should have never been included in > > CWARNFLAGS. However, not everyone agrees the code should be compiled > > without it. We could resume the discussion on this topic on it's own > > thread, as it is a complex issue. > > Ok, I'll start a new thread for that. My brain is grateful. > > --Jeremy
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
