These are leftovers from when X still used Xmalloc and friends for allocation.
Now that those are gone, these comments are just confusing.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Adkins <[email protected]>
---
 hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c |    5 -----
 hw/xfree86/parser/Flags.c    |    2 --
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c
index ba4d20a..fbb17ae 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86Init.c
@@ -1046,11 +1046,6 @@ xf86PrintDefaultLibraryPath(void)
 int
 ddxProcessArgument(int argc, char **argv, int i)
 {
-  /*
-   * Note: can't use xalloc/xfree here because OsInit() hasn't been called
-   * yet.  Use malloc/free instead.
-   */
-
 #define CHECK_FOR_REQUIRED_ARGUMENT() \
     if (((i + 1) >= argc) || (!argv[i + 1])) {                                 
\
       ErrorF("Required argument to %s not specified\n", argv[i]);      \
diff --git a/hw/xfree86/parser/Flags.c b/hw/xfree86/parser/Flags.c
index 699dc6b..7fafb6c 100644
--- a/hw/xfree86/parser/Flags.c
+++ b/hw/xfree86/parser/Flags.c
@@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ xf86parseFlagsSection (void)
                                        if (ServerFlagsTab[i].token == token)
                                        {
                                                char *valstr = NULL;
-                                               /* can't use strdup because it 
calls malloc */
                                                tmp = strdup 
(ServerFlagsTab[i].name);
                                                if (hasvalue)
                                                {
@@ -365,7 +364,6 @@ xf86optionListCreate( const char **options, int count, int 
used )
        }
        for (i = 0; i < count; i += 2)
        {
-               /* can't use strdup because it calls malloc */
                t1 = malloc (sizeof (char) *
                                (strlen (options[i]) + 1));
                strcpy (t1, options[i]);
-- 
1.7.0.4

_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to