On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 04:21:26PM +0200, ext Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Tiago Vignatti wrote:
> > IOADDRESS type definition encompass more than just pci code, so move it to
> > common.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tiago Vignatti <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h | 1 +
> > hw/xfree86/os-support/bus/xf86Pci.h | 3 +--
> > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h
> > index de1f1b6..485c15a 100644
> > --- a/hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h
> > +++ b/hw/xfree86/common/xf86str.h
> > @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ typedef uint64_t memType;
> > typedef uintptr_t memType;
> > #endif
> >
> > +typedef unsigned long IOADDRESS; /* Must be large enough for a pointer
> > */
>
> If it must be large enough for a pointer, why not use uintptr_t like the code
> two lines before it?
I don't know. Seems uintptr_t is "unsigned int" in Linux, does it seems enough
to carry IO address there? Ajax?
Tiago
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
