On 21/04/10 15:32 +0200, Vignatti Tiago wrote: > On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 03:00:52PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > > > So instead you decide to increase the maintenance burden on everybody > > else by making the code harder to read and requiring them to remember > > to wrap new code that depends on libdrm in more #ifdefs. > > As I said, it's a trade-off. > > Customize an Xorg for a given system is only being discussed recently. I'd > like to see an implementation very small and with few code, so I can maintain > and enhance easily. > > Besides, Xorg is open-source and we should try discuss ways to embrace > everyone's willings. Anyway, I'm pretty sure you understand my point of view. > I'm totally opened to hear best approaches how to circumvent this. >
How about dropping libdrm dependency from dri2? There is nothing else except drmAuthMagic used from libdrm for dri2. Pauli _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
