On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 10:51:17 +0200, Michel Dänzer <[email protected]> wrote:
> You're dodging the fundamental issues and deflecting to details. Please remember that the goal of switching to the current release model was to get releases made on time and avoid regressions. Given our previous record of making release dates has been a subject of some ridicule in the press, I'd say the process for 1.8 has improved on that score at least. I was trying to elicit specific problems that you observed to guide how to change the process while still keeping the key benefit of timely and stable releases. I still think you should try doing EXA development in a separate tree and asking to have that merged to master when it's got good stuff in it. Anyone interested in tracking EXA would get the added benefit of running precisely what you've been testing and avoiding all of the non-EXA work which might destabilize their servers. -- [email protected]
pgpaWb19Cz50w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
