On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 09:10 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > 2010/4/7 Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>: > > On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 19:27 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > >> 2010/4/6 Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>: > >> > Something else I'm wondering: Does it make sense to install the > >> > xorg.conf.d snippet unconditionally, or will it hurt with the server > >> > using HAL? > >> > >> It's kind of delicate. I think it should be done unconditionally, but > >> it might cause user configuration regressions. Since the settings in > >> xorg.conf.d will override the backend supplied options (fdi settings > >> in the case of hal), you could end up overloading some user's setup. > >> Ultimately, this is the way to go to be compatible with any server > >> backend, whether udev or hal or some other fictitious service, so I > >> think it's the right thing to do. > > > > But (how) will the InputClass be associated with anything from HAL? > > For hal, you'll want to set the input.tags key to vmmouse in the fdi > file. See server commit c6d9bc092c84ad5c68083a126aa7577baa42cef7. Or, > I should say that you should have hal-probe-vmmouse also set the > input.tags key to vmmouse.
I did that for the release, thanks. -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
