Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 10:41:01AM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Will we be following the same model as Xorg 1.7.x branches for 1.8?
>> (i.e. anyone can push to -nominations, release manager pulls from that
>> branch to server-1.8-branch when doing a release/snapshot)
>
> Sorry for the delay, I'm still working on reducing my inbox to something
> sane.
Sanity is overrated.
> As Keith already pointed out, I've volunteered to do the 1.8 stable branch
> again. I think this was also mentioned on #xorg-devel and so far no
> objections have been raised. If you (or anyone else of course) would like to
> take over the 1.8 stable releases instead please feel free to do so.
Hah! Nice try, you can't get out of it that easily - I'm more than happy to
see you continue as you did a fine job with 1.7.x.
> To get a patch into 1.8, please follow the same process as for master,
> i.e. CC me on the _reviewed_ patch or (preferably) send me a pull request
> for the already-cherry-picked patches.
Okay - we should make sure the wiki documentation is up-to-date, but using the
same process for stable & master certainly makes sense to me.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
_______________________________________________
[email protected]: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
