Hi, On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 04:18:18PM -0700, Corbin Simpson wrote: > I'm not perfect, but I think the legalese is equivalent to the package > license? If not, we can always hack around it.
Not necessarily. > +/** Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and > **/ > +/** its documentation for any purpose and without fee is hereby > **/ > +/** granted, provided that the above copyright notice appear in all > **/ > +/** copies and that both that copyright notice and this permis- > **/ > +/** sion notice appear in supporting documentation, and that the > **/ > +/** name of Solbourne not be used in advertising > **/ > +/** in publicity pertaining to distribution of the software without > **/ > +/** specific, written prior permission. > **/ The 'without fee' bit is the problem: they've not given you permission to use/copy/modify/distribute in exchange for money. Cheers, Daniel
pgpsB6ku8mfe9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ [email protected]: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
