The index [0] for the second valuator looks bogus; fix it.

Signed-off-by: Oldřich Jedlička <[email protected]>
---
 dix/getevents.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dix/getevents.c b/dix/getevents.c
index bfde2e9..82bb77b 100644
--- a/dix/getevents.c
+++ b/dix/getevents.c
@@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ updateSlaveDeviceCoords(DeviceIntPtr master, DeviceIntPtr 
pDev)
                         &pDev->last.remainder[0], NULL, pDev->valuator->axes + 
0, scr->width);
     if(pDev->valuator->numAxes > 1)
         pDev->last.valuators[1] = rescaleValuatorAxis(pDev->last.valuators[1], 
pDev->last.remainder[1],
-                        &pDev->last.remainder[0], NULL, pDev->valuator->axes + 
1, scr->height);
+                        &pDev->last.remainder[1], NULL, pDev->valuator->axes + 
1, scr->height);
 
     /* calculate the other axis as well based on info from the old
      * slave-device. If the old slave had less axes than this one,
-- 
1.6.6

_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel

Reply via email to