On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 20:58 +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:14:47AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 23:55 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > > > So, this is just a quick status check on the new development > > > model. I'd like to hear from anyone with an opinion on how it's > > > working for them. > > > > > > Obviously we're seeing a bit more delay in getting patches into > > > master, but I think that's been mostly positive, with a bit more > > > discussion happening on various patch sets about the best way to do > > > things. > > > > > > Am I providing enough feedback about patches that aren't immediately > > > applied? Do people want more comments on patches which are applied? > > > Has anyone had a patch go missing (neither applied nor replied to)? Am > > > I messing up in some other way? > > > > It's not working too well for EXA yet; a number of acked patches haven't > > been applied yet. > > I'd suggest creating your own tree and sending pull requests, rather > than relying on random patchsets on the list being vaccuumed up ...
Are there at least any indications that we're getting any tangible benefits from this increased workload? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.vmware.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
