Excerpts from Daniel Stone's message of Thu Oct 22 20:55:57 +0900 2009: > I mean just for CARDxx and INTxx, i.e. they really only have the number > of bits implied by the type. XID/Atom/etc, where they're just used as > unsigned long, will have to stay that way. Shrug.
Yeah, the CARD/INT stuff should be replaced globally, starting with header file hacks and moving into the rest of the code. However, the suggested patch also replaced the XID types everywhere. > In what sense is CARD32/INT32 more self-documenting than > uint32_t/int32_t? I only meant to reference Window/Pixmap/etc where the typenames all point at XID but provide additional information about the API. -- [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
