Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Any comments on the use of different names for the same thing? (maybe you
> missed that in the previous email)
Oops, yes, I'd missed that.
> Cut from this patch:
>> +SIGIO_DEFAULT="yes"
>> +AC_ARG_ENABLE(sigio-default, AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-sigio-default]
>> + SIGIO_DEFAULT_VALUE=TRUE
>> + FLAG_USE_SIGIO
>> + if (!xf86Info.useSIGIO) {
>> +.BI "Option \*qUseSIGIO\*q \*q" boolean \*q
>
> IMO we should use USE_SIGIO in configure.ac as well if that is the one
> exposed in the xorg.conf.
I was trying to expose that it was the default value for UseSIGIO, that
configure sets, not disabling the build of the SIGIO code altogether.
Would USE_SIGIO_DEFAULT make sense? What about the --enable option?
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [email protected]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
