On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:03 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Tomas Carnecky <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac >> index f4e1dbb..f02292f 100644 >> --- a/configure.ac >> +++ b/configure.ac >> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ AC_CHECK_HEADERS([fcntl.h stdlib.h string.h >> unistd.h]) >> >> dnl Checks for typedefs, structures, and compiler characteristics. >> AC_C_CONST >> +AC_C_INLINE >> AC_C_BIGENDIAN([ENDIAN="X_BIG_ENDIAN"], [ENDIAN="X_LITTLE_ENDIAN"]) > > You could do this check once in xproto and define _X_INLINE > appropriately. Then all X users could take advantage of it.
FWIW, Xfuncproto.h already contains preprocessor directives that check for inline support (based on compiler type/version) and sets _X_INLINE appropriately. I was just trying to clean up the different inline keywords. I asked on IRC and Alan responded that it's ok to settle on C99 inline. I don't think that's an unreasonable requirement, given that we already require other C99 extensions (named initializers, variadic macros etc). tom _______________________________________________ xorg-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
