> On 4 May 2021, at 12:48, Jan Beulich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 04.05.2021 11:46, Luca Fancellu wrote:
>> @@ -451,11 +466,6 @@ DEFINE_XEN_GUEST_HANDLE(gnttab_transfer_t);
>> * bytes to be copied.
>> */
>>
>> -#define _GNTCOPY_source_gref (0)
>> -#define GNTCOPY_source_gref (1<<_GNTCOPY_source_gref)
>> -#define _GNTCOPY_dest_gref (1)
>> -#define GNTCOPY_dest_gref (1<<_GNTCOPY_dest_gref)
>> -
>> struct gnttab_copy {
>> /* IN parameters. */
>> struct gnttab_copy_ptr {
>> @@ -471,6 +481,12 @@ struct gnttab_copy {
>> /* OUT parameters. */
>> int16_t status;
>> };
>> +
>> +#define _GNTCOPY_source_gref (0)
>> +#define GNTCOPY_source_gref (1<<_GNTCOPY_source_gref)
>> +#define _GNTCOPY_dest_gref (1)
>> +#define GNTCOPY_dest_gref (1<<_GNTCOPY_dest_gref)
>
> Didn't you say you agree with moving this back up some, next to the
> field using these?
Hi Jan,
My mistake! I’ll move it in the next patch, did you spot anything else I might
have forgot of what we agreed?
Cheers,
Luca
>
> Jan
