Jan Beulich writes ("[PATCH v2 2/2] tools/x86: move arch-specific include/xen/
population into arch-specific rule"):
> There's no need for the common "xen-dir" rule to have an arch-specific
> part when there already is a arch-specific rule where this can be taken
> care of (arguably instead of all-y this might better be xendir-y
> anyway).
Thanks, but I do not like this change.
IMO make commands should be primarily organised by their logical
function and role in the file. If that means that multiple targets
have arch-specific parts, so be it.
IMO it is not right to move something from xen-dir to all just to
reduce the number of different targets with arch-specific parts.
Ian.
