> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> > Sent: 02 October 2020 23:42 > To: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Cc: Durrant, Paul <[email protected]>; George Dunlap > <[email protected]>; Ian Jackson > <[email protected]>; Jan Beulich <[email protected]>; Julien Grall > <[email protected]>; Stefano > Stabellini <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [PATCH v9 4/8] docs/specs: add missing definitions to > libxc-migration-stream > > CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click > links or open > attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the content is safe. > > > > On 24/09/2020 14:10, Paul Durrant wrote: > > From: Paul Durrant <[email protected]> > > > > The STATIC_DATA_END, X86_CPUID_POLICY and X86_MSR_POLICY record types have > > sections explaining what they are but their values are not defined. Indeed > > their values are defined as "Reserved for future mandatory records." > > > > Also, the spec revision is adjusted to match the migration stream version > > and an END record is added to the description of a 'typical save record for > > and x86 HVM guest.' > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <[email protected]> > > Fixes: 6f71b5b1506 ("docs/migration Specify migration v3 and > > STATIC_DATA_END") > > Fixes: ddd273d8863 ("docs/migration: Specify X86_{CPUID,MSR}_POLICY > > records") > > Oops sorry. I swear I had these at one point. I can only presume it > got swallowed by a rebase at some point. >
Can I take that as an R-b? Paul > ~Andrew
