----- 7 lip 2020 o 13:21, Jan Beulich [email protected] napisał(a): > On 07.07.2020 13:17, Michał Leszczyński wrote: >> So would it be OK to use uint32_t everywhere and to store the trace buffer >> size as number of kB? I think this is the most straightforward option. >> >> I would also stick with the name "processor_trace_buf_size" >> everywhere, both in the hypervisor, ABI and the toolstack, with the >> respective comments that the size is in kB. > > Perhaps even more clearly "processor_trace_buf_kb" then? > > Jan
Ok. Best regards, Michał Leszczyński CERT Polska
