> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich <[email protected]> > Sent: 10 January 2020 09:52 > To: Durrant, Paul <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Andrew Cooper > <[email protected]>; George Dunlap <[email protected]>; > Ian Jackson <[email protected]>; Julien Grall <[email protected]>; > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>; Stefano Stabellini > <[email protected]>; Wei Liu <[email protected]>; Lars Kurth > <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Introduce CHANGELOG.md > > On 10.01.2020 10:12, Paul Durrant wrote: > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/CHANGELOG.md > > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ > > +# Changelog > > + > > +All notable changes to Xen will be documented in this file. > > How do we qualify what's "notable" and what's not? IOW I wonder > whether "All" should be dropped, or be replaced by "Some". >
Agreed that it's debatable. Perhaps just drop the 'All' and say: 'Notable changes to Xen will be documented in this file.' ? Patch authors ought to update the file if they consider their contribution(s) notable but I'd also hope that maintainers will express an opinion as to whether something should be included/not included. It's not going to be fool-proof but I think it will be better than nothing. Paul > Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
