On 20/12/2019 16:23, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 16.09.2019 11:40, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Using memcpy() may result in multiple individual byte accesses >> (dependening how memcpy() is implemented and how the resulting insns, >> e.g. REP MOVSB, get carried out in hardware), which isn't what we >> want/need for carrying out guest insns as correctly as possible. Fall >> back to memcpy() only for accesses not 2, 4, or 8 bytes in size. >> >> Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
