> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
> Sent: 27 November 2019 11:10
> To: Durrant, Paul <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>; George Dunlap
> <[email protected]>; Juergen Gross <[email protected]>; Stefano
> Stabellini <[email protected]>; Julien Grall <[email protected]>; Wei
> Liu <[email protected]>; Paul Durrant <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper
> <[email protected]>; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <[email protected]>; Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
> <[email protected]>; Hans van Kranenburg <[email protected]>;
> Jan Beulich <[email protected]>; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13 2/2] Rationalize max_grant_frames
> and max_maptrack_frames handling
> 
> Durrant, Paul writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13 2/2] Rationalize
> max_grant_frames and max_maptrack_frames handling"):
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Xen-devel <[email protected]> On Behalf Of
> Ian
> > > Jackson
> > > I have seen reports of users who ran out of grant/maptrack frames
> > > because of updates to use multiring protocols etc.  The error messages
> > > are not very good and the recommended workaround has been to increase
> > > the default limit on the hypervisor command line.
> > >
> > > It is important that we don't break that workaround!
> >
> > Alas it has apparently been broken for several releases now :-(
> 
> I guess at least in Debian (where I have seen this) we haven't
> released with any affected versions yet...

I believe the problem was introduce in 4.10, so I think it would be prudent to 
also back-port the final fix to stable trees from then on.

  Paul

> 
> Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to