Anthony PERARD writes ("Re: [PATCH 11/15] libxl_usb: Fix wrong usage of
asserts"):
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 05:44:03PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Anthony PERARD writes ("[PATCH 11/15] libxl_usb: Fix wrong usage of
> > asserts"):
> > > Signed-off-by: Anthony PERARD <[email protected]>
> >
> > I'm not sure why you wouldn't just delete the breaks, rather than
> > replacing them "return" ?
>
> Because asserts aren't supposed to be compiled in a release build. I
> know that's not the case in libxl...
Oh I see.
> I could replace the assert(0) by abort() instead, they won't be need for
> a break or return after it.
Yes, please.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
