Anthony PERARD writes ("[PATCH 16/35] libxl: Inline do_usbdev_remove into
libxl__device_usbdev_remove"):
> Having the function do_usbdev_remove makes it harder to add asynchronous
> calls into it. Move its body back into libxl__device_usbdev_remove and
> adjust the latter as there are no reason to have a separated function.
Acked-by: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
