On 10/09/2019 15:43, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 09.09.2019 15:47, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> --- a/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/xenctrl_stubs.c
>> +++ b/tools/ocaml/libs/xc/xenctrl_stubs.c
>> @@ -690,7 +690,8 @@ CAMLprim value stub_xc_physinfo(value xch)
>>      BUILD_BUG_ON(XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_hvm      != (1u <<  0));
>>      BUILD_BUG_ON(XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_pv       != (1u <<  1));
>>      BUILD_BUG_ON(XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_directio != (1u <<  2));
>> -    BUILD_BUG_ON(XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_MAX      != 
>> XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_directio);
>> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_hap      != (1u <<  3));
>> +    BUILD_BUG_ON(XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_MAX      != XEN_SYSCTL_PHYSCAP_hap);
>>      cap_list = c_bitmap_to_ocaml_list(c_physinfo.capabilities);
>>  
>>      physinfo = caml_alloc_tuple(10);
> I'm afraid in particular this hunk doesn't apply anymore, and
> I'm not confident that simply dropping it is the right answer.
> I'd therefore like to ask for a proper re-base, or for someone
> else to apply the result of folding these additions into the
> base patch.

Roger is currently working on a rebase.  There is also a logical error
which requires the addition of CAP_SHADOW.

~Andrew

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to