On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 11:40:43PM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> I am not sure I agree with this rename. The implementation of the helpers
> are very Arm specific as this is assuming Dom0 is 1:1 mapped.
>
> This was necessary due to the lack of IOMMU on Arm platforms back then.
> But this is now a pain to get rid of it on newer platform...
So if you look at the final version of the header after the whole
series, what assumes a 1:1 mapping? It all just is
if (pfn_valid())
local cache sync;
else
call into the arch code;
are you concerned that the local cache sync might have to be split
up more for a non-1:1 map in that case? We could just move
the xen_dma_* routines into the arch instead of __xen_dma, but it
really helps to have a common interface header.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
