On 08.08.19 11:36, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 08.08.19 10:33, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 08/08/2019 05:50, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 07.08.19 20:11, Andrew Cooper wrote:
For sanity sake, we should enforce unique naming of any lock
registered for
profiling.
This would be every lock inited via DEFINE_SPINLOCK(). I can do a
followup patch for that purpose.
I was wondering how to do this. One option which comes to mind is to
put an non-static object into .discard.lock_profile or something, so the
linker will object to repeated symbol names and then throw all of them
away.
I could just drop the "static" in the _LOCK_PROFILE_PTR() macro.
Unfortunately this doesn't work for locks defined in a function body.
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
