On 7/19/19 12:09 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 7/19/19 11:03 AM, Nicolas Belouin wrote:
>>
>> On 7/19/19 10:50 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>>> On Jul 19, 2019, at 9:47 AM, George Dunlap <[email protected]> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 19, 2019, at 8:34 AM, Nicolas Belouin <[email protected]> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/18/19 11:54 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>> The Go bindings for libxl miss functions from libxl_utils, let's start
>>>>>> with the simple libxl_domid_to_name and its counterpart
>>>>>> libxl_name_to_domid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NB that C.GoString() will return "" if it's passed a NULL; see
>>>>>> https://github.com/golang/go/issues/32734#issuecomment-506835432
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Belouin <[email protected]>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>> - Wire into build system
>>>>>> - Add reference to C.GoString() handling NULL to commit message
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nicolas, could you test to see if this actually works for you?
>>>>> Tested it, it works.
>>>>>
>>>>> I must confess I do not use that import path as the new modules mechanism
>>>>> introduced in Go1.11 downloads and compile a versioned copy of every
>>>>> dependency per project, and this behavior is incompatible with the build
>>>>> system used here.
>>>> It’s possible that something fundamentally has changed, but I suspect that 
>>>> rather you don’t quite understand how the current build system is supposed 
>>>> to work.  (In which case a write-up in the tree would probably be useful.)
>>>>
>>>> Go has always insisted that there be no binary compatibility between 
>>>> versions; so it’s always been necessary to re-compile all your libraries 
>>>> when upgrading from (say) 1.8 to 1.9.  Which means that any useable 
>>>> distribution must also include all the source files necessary to recompile 
>>>> when you bump the version number.
>>>>
>>>> So the core mechanism of the “install” is actually to copy all the source 
>>>> files necessary into the right local directory such that the go compiler 
>>>> can find them; ATM this is /usr/share/gocode/golang.xenproject.org/xenlight
>>> Nit:  This of course should have a `src/` between `gocode/` and 
>>> `golang.xenproject.org/`.
>>>
>>> NB also that this naming scheme was designed so that at some point in the 
>>> future, we could actually host the xenlight packages at the URL provided.
>>>
>>>  -George
>>>
>> This new mechanism of modules is described here:
>> https://golang.org/cmd/go/#hdr-Modules__module_versions__and_more
>>
>> The module system is intended to supersede the GOPATH approach and
>> provide a way to get versioned dependencies, as such
>> it does not rely on GOPATH at all and doesn't use sources or compiled
>> packages present in GOPATH elements such as /usr/share/gocode
>> and systematically fetch (at the asked version) and compile a copy of
>> the dependency as it might be a different version from the one
>> in GOPATH.
>>
>> As far as I tried, I have been unable to build my module even with the
>> library installed.
>> I have to use xenbits.xen.org/git-http/xen.git/tools/golang/xenlight (or
>> one of its mirror) in order to build the module using the new
>> mechanism (the golang.xenproject.org/xenlight works when building with
>> modules mode disabled).
> I took a look at the module stuff when it came out, and I was never able
> to make sense of how it was supposed to work.
Basically it is the same idea than a python virtualenv with
|include-system-site-packages set to false: never use what is provided
by the system and download everything in the exact version the manifest
tells you to.
|
> <rant>On the whole, it seems they basically hate the idea of distro
> packages, and seem intent on breaking them whenever people manage to
> start to get them working.</rant>
Actually yes because they don't want to be bound to the version provided
by the distro (I will not enter the debate of whether it is a good thing
or not)

Nicolas
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to