Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.7-testing test] 137065: regressions
- FAIL"):
> The one you've picked looks to be a "fail never pass" one, so is perhaps
> not ideal. I've looked at a couple other ones, and in particular when the
> guests are supposedly 64-bit I notice two things
> - they look to be busy looping on vCPU 0,
> - the VMCS/VMCB dumps suggest they've never left early boot (i.e.
> are still in 32-bit mode with paging still disabled), and may well still
> be sitting inside the boot loader.
> I'm not at all certain though if this helps in any way.
I have not yet managed to make much progress with this. In my most
recent attempt I backported all of the build fixes onto the
last-working Xen revision.
The branch I built and tested was this:
[email protected]:xen.git/t.47
And it failed:
flight 137255 xen-unstable play [play]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/137255/
I think the most likely culprit is the OVMF/seabios changes.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
