On Fri, Dec 07, 2018 at 09:50:30AM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 07/12/2018 09:21, osstest service owner wrote: > > flight 131065 xen-unstable real [real] > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/131065/ > > > > Regressions :-( > > > > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, > > including tests which could not be run: > > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 69 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-278 fail REGR. vs. > > 130985 > > test-xtf-amd64-amd64-4 69 xtf/test-hvm64-xsa-278 fail REGR. vs. > > 130985 > > --- Xen Test Framework --- > Environment: HVM 64bit (Long mode 4 levels) > XSA-278 PoC > Fail: vmread, got nothing, expected #UD > Fail: vmwrite, got nothing, expected #UD > Success: Probably not vulnerable to XSA-278 > Test result: FAILURE > > These are on godello0 and 1 which are Haswell boxes, but I'm at a > complete loss to explain the results (not least because this is the same > type of system as my normal test box). > > The most logical option (given how I fixed the #UD checks in XSA-278) is > that VMCS shadowing is unexpectedly active, but there are no patches in > staging which look like they plausibly might be causing this. >
I can reserve one of the boxes for you to investigate if that's of interest. Wei. > ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
