> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 26 November 2018 11:42
> To: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>
> Cc: Julien Grall <[email protected]>; Andrew Cooper
> <[email protected]>; Roger Pau Monne <[email protected]>; Wei
> Liu <[email protected]>; George Dunlap <[email protected]>; Ian
> Jackson <[email protected]>; Stefano Stabellini
> <[email protected]>; xen-devel <[email protected]>;
> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>; Tim (Xen.org)
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/6] vpci: fix deferral of long operations
>
> >>> On 20.11.18 at 17:01, <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Current logic to handle long running operations is flawed because it
> > doesn't prevent the guest vcpu from running. Fix this by raising a
> > scheduler softirq when preemption is required, so that the do_softirq
> > call in the guest entry path performs a rescheduling. Also move the
> > call to vpci_process_pending into handle_hvm_io_completion, together
> > with the IOREQ code that handles pending IO instructions.
> >
> > Note that a scheduler softirq is also raised when the long running
> > operation is queued in order to prevent the guest vcpu from resuming
> > execution.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Cc: Paul Durrant <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Andrew Cooper <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Wei Liu <[email protected]>
> > Cc: George Dunlap <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Ian Jackson <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Julien Grall <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Stefano Stabellini <[email protected]>
> > Cc: Tim Deegan <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Changes since v4:
> > - Add a comment to clarify defer_map raising a scheduler softirq.
> > - Reword commit message.
> > - Raise the scheduler softirq in handle_hvm_io_completion rather than
> > vpci_process_pending.
> >
> > Changes since v3:
> > - Don't use a tasklet.
> > ---
> > xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c | 9 ++++++---
>
> Paul - I'll take the liberty and reinstate your v4 R-b for v5.
>
That's fine.
Paul
> Jan
>
> > xen/drivers/vpci/header.c | 5 +++++
> > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c
> > index a56d634f31..71f23227e6 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/ioreq.c
> > @@ -85,9 +85,6 @@ bool hvm_io_pending(struct vcpu *v)
> > struct hvm_ioreq_server *s;
> > unsigned int id;
> >
> > - if ( has_vpci(d) && vpci_process_pending(v) )
> > - return true;
> > -
> > FOR_EACH_IOREQ_SERVER(d, id, s)
> > {
> > struct hvm_ioreq_vcpu *sv;
> > @@ -186,6 +183,12 @@ bool handle_hvm_io_completion(struct vcpu *v)
> > enum hvm_io_completion io_completion;
> > unsigned int id;
> >
> > + if ( has_vpci(d) && vpci_process_pending(v) )
> > + {
> > + raise_softirq(SCHEDULE_SOFTIRQ);
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > +
> > FOR_EACH_IOREQ_SERVER(d, id, s)
> > {
> > struct hvm_ioreq_vcpu *sv;
> > diff --git a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> > index 39dffb21fb..c9bdc2ced3 100644
> > --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> > @@ -184,6 +184,11 @@ static void defer_map(struct domain *d, struct
> pci_dev
> > *pdev,
> > curr->vpci.mem = mem;
> > curr->vpci.cmd = cmd;
> > curr->vpci.rom_only = rom_only;
> > + /*
> > + * Raise a scheduler softirq in order to prevent the guest from
> > resuming
> > + * execution with pending mapping operations.
> > + */
> > + raise_softirq(SCHEDULE_SOFTIRQ);
> > }
> >
> > static int modify_bars(const struct pci_dev *pdev, uint16_t cmd, bool
> > rom_only)
> > --
> > 2.19.1
>
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
