On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 7:41 AM Razvan Cojocaru <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/5/18 2:00 PM, Razvan Cojocaru wrote: > > On 9/27/18 2:25 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > >> The name of the "with_gla" flag is confusing; it has nothing to do > >> with the existence or lack thereof of a faulting GLA, but rather where > >> the fault originated. The npfec.kind value is always valid, and > >> should thus be propagated, regardless of whether gla_valid is set or > >> not. > >> > >> In particular, gla_valid will never be set on AMD systems; but > >> npfec.kind will still be valid and should still be propagated. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Isaila <[email protected]> > >> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap <[email protected]> > > > > Acked-by: Razvan Cojocaru <[email protected]> > > Does this also need Tamas' ack to go in?
Hm, I recall acking this patch before. In any case: Acked-by: Tamas K Lengyel <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
