>>> On 08.10.18 at 19:39, <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/10/18 14:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 05.10.18 at 16:54, <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> @@ -405,19 +419,6 @@ struct domain *domain_create(domid_t domid,
>>>  
>>>      if ( !is_idle_domain(d) )
>>>      {
>>> -        /* Check d->max_vcpus and allocate d->vcpu[]. */
>>> -        err = -EINVAL;
>>> -        if ( config->max_vcpus < 1 ||
>>> -             config->max_vcpus > domain_max_vcpus(d) )
>>> -            goto fail;
>> Ah, there it goes away. But I think it would be more logical for this to
>> happen in the previous patch. Anyway
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
>> for both, preferably (but not necessarily) with the removal moved
>> there.
> 
> The x86 side is trivial, but the ARM side is not.  I don't think patches
> 3 and 4 should be merged, but I'll let Julien/Stefano have the final say.

I didn't suggest merging the patches, I'd merely like to see
the removal above to move into the earlier patch, and the
x86 variant of domain_max_vcpus() be dropped there
instead of here (because that's where the need for both
logically disappears).

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

Reply via email to